-52.3%
ZTS vs PLTD
-77.7%
+25.4%
-60.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | -5.5% | +9.2% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +4.2% | -5.3% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +10.8% | +20.8% | -10.1% | +11.4% |
| 3M | +14.1% | -2.6% | +16.6% | +14.0% |
| 6M | +0.8% | -33.1% | +33.8% | 0.0% |
| YTD | -33.1% | -20.0% | -13.1% | -32.8% |
| 1Y | -30.0% | -21.6% | -8.3% | -29.7% |
| All | -52.3% | -77.7% | +25.4% | -54.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling