-58.5%
ZTS vs NIO
-64.6%
+6.1%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.6% | +0.9% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -13.0% | +11.1% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -18.3% | +20.2% | +2.8% |
| 3M | -4.0% | -33.2% | +29.2% | -2.2% |
| 6M | -39.1% | -21.5% | -17.6% | -38.9% |
| YTD | -38.8% | -25.5% | -13.3% | -38.4% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | -38.0% | -11.6% | -48.8% |
| All | -58.5% | -64.6% | +6.1% | -58.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling