-32.1%
ZTS vs LII
-29.2%
-2.9%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -2.0% | -1.3% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -0.6% | +0.2% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +11.7% | -4.6% | +16.3% | +12.6% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -21.2% | +24.7% | +7.7% |
| 6M | -27.6% | -36.4% | +8.8% | -22.0% |
| YTD | -35.5% | -28.9% | -6.5% | -33.3% |
| 1Y | -32.1% | -29.5% | -2.6% | -30.0% |
| All | -32.1% | -29.2% | -2.9% | -30.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling