-49.6%
ZTS vs LII
-28.2%
-21.4%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.2% | -1.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -0.7% | -1.3% | -1.9% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -12.6% | +14.5% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -4.0% | -24.4% | +20.4% | -0.6% |
| 6M | -39.1% | -28.7% | -10.4% | -35.9% |
| YTD | -38.8% | -19.1% | -19.7% | -37.6% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | -29.7% | -19.9% | -48.4% |
| All | -49.6% | -28.2% | -21.4% | -48.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling