-30.0%
ZTS vs LDOS
-32.8%
+2.8%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -2.1% | +2.5% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -3.5% | +4.5% | +2.0% |
| 30D | +12.4% | +9.5% | +2.9% | +9.7% |
| 3M | +13.6% | -6.3% | +19.9% | +15.1% |
| 6M | +9.3% | +2.8% | +6.5% | +8.0% |
| YTD | -32.6% | -26.6% | -5.9% | -31.3% |
| 1Y | -30.0% | -31.3% | +1.3% | -26.4% |
| All | -30.0% | -32.8% | +2.8% | -26.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling