-54.4%
ZTS vs KRMN
+17.4%
-71.8%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -11.3% | +10.9% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -12.9% | +9.1% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -2.0% | -43.3% | +41.3% | +0.6% |
| 3M | -10.2% | -27.2% | +17.0% | -9.3% |
| 6M | -39.4% | -66.8% | +27.4% | -36.3% |
| YTD | -40.8% | -51.9% | +11.0% | -39.9% |
| 1Y | -50.1% | -43.7% | -6.5% | -49.8% |
| All | -54.4% | +17.4% | -71.8% | -57.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling