-61.5%
ZTS vs FRSH
-72.4%
+10.9%
-69.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FRSH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.4% | +1.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.8% | -9.6% | +5.8% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -2.0% | -0.4% | -1.6% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -10.2% | +27.2% | -37.4% | -13.2% |
| 6M | -39.4% | +42.2% | -81.6% | -42.5% |
| YTD | -40.8% | -2.6% | -38.2% | -41.3% |
| 1Y | -50.1% | -10.2% | -40.0% | -50.0% |
| 3Y | -58.9% | -45.5% | -13.4% | -57.0% |
| All | -61.5% | -72.4% | +10.9% | -59.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FRSH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FRSH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FRSH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FRSH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling