-50.6%
ZTS vs FIGR
-3.1%
-47.5%
-51.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -4.6% | +4.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -3.0% | -0.7% | -3.7% |
| 30D | -0.8% | +13.7% | -14.4% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -9.7% | +23.9% | -33.6% | -9.8% |
| 6M | -38.4% | -8.4% | -30.0% | -38.5% |
| YTD | -41.1% | -14.6% | -26.5% | -41.4% |
| 1Y | -50.6% | +12.1% | -62.7% | -50.4% |
| All | -50.6% | -3.1% | -47.5% | -50.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling