-59.2%
ZTS vs EOSE
+44.0%
-103.2%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -3.9% | +3.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -4.5% | +14.0% | -18.5% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -5.9% | +2.6% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -9.7% | -34.3% | +24.5% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -38.8% | -37.8% | -1.1% | -38.9% |
| YTD | -41.2% | -65.2% | +24.0% | -40.9% |
| 1Y | -50.3% | -41.9% | -8.4% | -50.8% |
| All | -59.2% | +44.0% | -103.2% | -62.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling