-48.8%
ZTS vs ENTG
+64.3%
-113.1%
-64.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +11.3% | -11.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +7.9% | -15.4% | -8.0% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -3.6% | +13.4% | +9.8% |
| 3M | +10.3% | +2.7% | +7.6% | +9.4% |
| 6M | +9.2% | +3.6% | +5.6% | +6.6% |
| YTD | -32.9% | +83.6% | -116.5% | -39.9% |
| 1Y | -29.7% | +84.9% | -114.6% | -37.3% |
| All | -48.8% | +64.3% | -113.1% | -57.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling