-39.1%
ZTS vs CLBK
+39.3%
-78.4%
-42.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | 0.0% | -0.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +1.2% | -3.2% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +9.1% | -7.2% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -4.0% | +27.7% | -31.7% | -12.5% |
| 6M | -39.1% | +40.8% | -80.0% | -48.3% |
| All | -39.1% | +39.3% | -78.4% | -48.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling