-58.5%
ZTS vs AMC
-79.6%
+21.1%
-63.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +4.3% | -5.0% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +2.3% | -4.3% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -0.7% | +2.7% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -4.0% | +35.2% | -39.2% | -5.9% |
| 6M | -39.1% | +124.6% | -163.7% | -41.7% |
| YTD | -38.8% | +69.9% | -108.7% | -40.9% |
| 1Y | -49.6% | -2.6% | -47.0% | -50.6% |
| All | -58.5% | -79.6% | +21.1% | -57.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling