+34.0%
ZM vs TRGP
+261.7%
-227.7%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.0% | +0.7% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -0.7% | +1.0% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -10.3% | +9.5% | -19.7% | -11.4% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +10.8% | -11.5% | -2.5% |
| 6M | +24.8% | +25.3% | -0.5% | +20.0% |
| YTD | +11.5% | +60.3% | -48.8% | +2.5% |
| 1Y | +12.3% | +84.6% | -72.2% | +0.1% |
| All | +34.0% | +261.7% | -227.7% | +12.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling