+33.1%
ZM vs TPG
+81.8%
-48.7%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +1.6% | -1.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -5.7% | -9.4% | +3.7% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -9.1% | -5.3% | -3.8% | -7.6% |
| 3M | +3.5% | +12.9% | -9.4% | -0.1% |
| 6M | +25.7% | +20.1% | +5.6% | +18.7% |
| YTD | +10.8% | -22.5% | +33.2% | +17.8% |
| 1Y | +12.8% | -19.7% | +32.5% | +18.2% |
| 3Y | +33.1% | +81.2% | -48.1% | +3.4% |
| All | +33.1% | +81.8% | -48.7% | +3.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling