-2.6%
ZM vs SSNC
+20.9%
-23.5%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | SSNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +0.2% | +2.0% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +11.0% | +2.3% | +8.7% | +9.7% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -3.1% | +8.7% | +6.1% |
| 3M | -9.1% | -2.7% | -6.4% | -8.9% |
| 6M | -2.6% | +23.7% | -26.2% | -16.4% |
| All | -2.6% | +20.9% | -23.5% | -16.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SSNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SSNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SSNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SSNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling