+33.8%
ZM vs SPG
+112.2%
-78.3%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.8% | +1.2% | -6.0% | -5.1% |
| 7D | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -4.9% | -2.8% | -6.5% |
| 3M | -4.7% | +3.3% | -8.0% | -5.8% |
| 6M | +24.4% | +11.2% | +13.2% | +19.5% |
| YTD | +11.8% | +17.1% | -5.3% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | +21.6% | -8.2% | +4.7% |
| 3Y | +33.8% | +111.9% | -78.0% | -3.2% |
| All | +33.8% | +112.2% | -78.3% | -3.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling