+56.6%
ZM vs RBRK
+124.5%
-67.9%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RBRK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.5% | +2.7% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -5.7% | -7.5% | +1.8% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -9.1% | -10.4% | +1.3% | -7.0% |
| 3M | +3.5% | +21.3% | -17.8% | -1.9% |
| 6M | +25.7% | +50.6% | -25.0% | +12.5% |
| YTD | +10.8% | +13.3% | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| 1Y | +12.8% | +11.2% | +1.5% | +6.0% |
| All | +56.6% | +124.5% | -67.9% | +24.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RBRK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RBRK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RBRK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RBRK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling