+16.4%
ZM vs PLTD
-77.8%
+94.2%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +4.6% | -1.4% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +5.9% | -3.0% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -11.6% | +12.3% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -29.9% | +26.3% | -8.1% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -28.5% | +58.4% | +25.5% |
| YTD | +17.4% | -20.4% | +37.8% | +16.3% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | -33.3% | +55.7% | +18.2% |
| All | +16.4% | -77.8% | +94.2% | -7.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling