-2.6%
ZM vs LH
+45.6%
-48.1%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -0.5% | +2.6% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +11.0% | +1.1% | +10.0% | +10.8% |
| 30D | +5.6% | +16.7% | -11.1% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -9.1% | +15.1% | -24.2% | -10.7% |
| 6M | -2.6% | +46.3% | -48.9% | -6.4% |
| All | -2.6% | +45.6% | -48.1% | -6.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling