+29.9%
ZM vs LCID
-53.6%
+83.5%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +1.7% | +1.5% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -6.6% | +9.5% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -30.1% | +30.8% | +3.1% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -17.6% | +13.9% | -3.4% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -54.4% | +84.3% | +36.4% |
| All | +29.9% | -53.6% | +83.5% | +36.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling