+9.6%
ZM vs LCID
-79.4%
+88.9%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +11.6% | -11.6% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -8.4% | -1.2% | -7.2% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -19.2% | +17.3% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -56.7% | +46.6% | -4.4% |
| 6M | -13.9% | -49.6% | +35.8% | -10.3% |
| YTD | +6.4% | -68.1% | +74.5% | +13.9% |
| 1Y | +9.6% | -79.4% | +89.0% | +26.0% |
| All | +9.6% | -79.4% | +88.9% | +26.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling