+29.9%
ZM vs GLXY
+20.9%
+9.0%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -0.6% | +3.9% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +13.4% | -10.5% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +38.1% | -37.4% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -7.3% | +3.6% | -3.1% |
| 6M | +29.9% | +8.2% | +21.7% | +28.3% |
| All | +29.9% | +20.9% | +9.0% | +28.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling