-65.4%
ZM vs GLDM
+121.8%
-187.2%
-79.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.8% | +2.0% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -5.9% | +4.7% | -10.5% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -5.2% | -0.9% | -4.3% | -5.0% |
| 3M | -11.3% | -4.3% | -7.0% | -10.6% |
| 6M | -14.5% | -13.4% | -1.1% | -12.9% |
| YTD | +4.2% | -5.8% | +10.0% | +4.0% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | +2.1% | +7.3% | +7.7% |
| 3Y | +45.4% | +105.0% | -59.6% | +18.4% |
| All | -65.4% | +121.8% | -187.2% | -74.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling