+25.9%
ZM vs FLNC
-36.5%
+62.4%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -8.3% | +8.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -4.2% | +4.5% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -10.3% | -20.0% | +9.7% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -56.9% | +56.2% | +7.0% |
| All | +25.9% | -36.5% | +62.4% | +33.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling