+9.6%
ZM vs FLNC
-69.0%
+78.5%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +10.2% | -10.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -8.4% | -2.1% | -6.3% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -20.8% | +18.9% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -61.3% | +51.3% | -3.6% |
| 6M | -13.9% | -50.9% | +37.0% | -8.8% |
| YTD | +6.4% | -69.4% | +75.8% | +13.6% |
| 1Y | +9.6% | -68.4% | +78.0% | +15.7% |
| All | +9.6% | -69.0% | +78.5% | +15.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling