+29.9%
ZM vs FFIV
+39.2%
-9.3%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FFIV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -0.4% | +3.7% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -1.0% | +3.9% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -5.1% | +5.8% | +2.9% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -4.5% | +0.8% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +29.9% | +36.5% | -6.6% | +10.8% |
| All | +29.9% | +39.2% | -9.3% | +10.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FFIV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FFIV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FFIV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FFIV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling