+24.8%
ZM vs FCUV
-68.1%
+92.9%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FCUV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -7.0% | +6.8% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -63.8% | +64.1% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -10.3% | -14.7% | +4.4% | -10.4% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +65.3% | -66.0% | -4.6% |
| 6M | +24.8% | -68.5% | +93.3% | +16.2% |
| All | +24.8% | -68.1% | +92.9% | +16.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCUV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCUV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCUV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCUV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling