+58.8%
ZM vs EPAM
-29.8%
+88.5%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +0.6% | -1.0% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +10.0% | -1.1% | +11.1% | +10.2% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +41.8% | -42.3% | -9.6% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +63.4% | -70.4% | -18.8% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +72.2% | -77.3% | -19.0% |
| YTD | +13.2% | -20.0% | +33.3% | +16.0% |
| 1Y | +15.3% | -9.0% | +24.4% | +14.2% |
| All | +58.8% | -29.8% | +88.5% | +58.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling