+37.5%
ZM vs CMS
+35.9%
+1.7%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -0.2% | +3.4% | +3.2% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +0.4% | +2.6% | +3.0% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -3.6% | +4.3% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -3.7% | -1.9% | -1.8% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -11.0% | +40.8% | +29.9% |
| YTD | +17.4% | +0.2% | +17.2% | +16.3% |
| 1Y | +22.4% | -1.3% | +23.7% | +21.4% |
| All | +37.5% | +35.9% | +1.7% | +24.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling