+18.8%
ZM vs BIYA
-98.3%
+117.1%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +11.0% | +9.0% | +2.0% | +10.9% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -12.9% | +18.6% | +5.8% |
| 3M | -9.1% | -54.7% | +45.5% | -8.5% |
| 6M | -2.6% | -85.1% | +82.5% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +15.7% | -96.9% | +112.5% | +10.8% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | -98.5% | +117.3% | +20.8% |
| All | +18.8% | -98.3% | +117.1% | +20.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling