+5.9%
ZM vs BBIO
+136.7%
-130.8%
-90.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -0.1% | +0.2% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -5.7% | -3.2% | -2.5% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -9.1% | -13.6% | +4.5% | -7.5% |
| 3M | +3.5% | +7.2% | -3.7% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +25.7% | +1.5% | +24.2% | +24.8% |
| YTD | +10.8% | -5.3% | +16.0% | +10.4% |
| 1Y | +12.8% | +37.7% | -25.0% | +6.8% |
| 3Y | +33.1% | +153.9% | -120.8% | +13.0% |
| 5Y | -68.3% | +43.9% | -112.2% | -77.6% |
| All | +5.9% | +136.7% | -130.8% | -28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling