+29.9%
ZM vs ACGL
-1.5%
+31.4%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | -1.7% | +5.0% | +3.2% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -0.7% | +3.7% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -1.0% | +1.7% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -3.7% | +11.0% | -14.7% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -0.3% | +30.2% | +33.7% |
| All | +29.9% | -1.5% | +31.4% | +33.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling