+10.3%
ZM vs ABCL
+199.8%
-189.5%
-25.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +5.2% | -3.2% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +12.4% | -12.7% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -6.2% | -0.4% | -5.8% | -6.2% |
| 3M | -12.2% | +80.4% | -92.6% | -14.5% |
| 6M | -16.0% | +138.5% | -154.6% | -19.1% |
| YTD | +6.3% | +265.5% | -259.2% | +1.1% |
| All | +10.3% | +199.8% | -189.5% | +8.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling