+100.7%
ZETA vs VG
-44.1%
+144.8%
-55.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | VG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +4.7% | -6.0% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +26.5% | +15.1% | +11.4% | +25.3% |
| 30D | +10.3% | -4.2% | +14.5% | +10.4% |
| 3M | +30.5% | -3.1% | +33.6% | +30.4% |
| 6M | +129.4% | +0.3% | +129.0% | +126.6% |
| YTD | +83.1% | +95.5% | -12.3% | +59.2% |
| 1Y | +82.1% | +64.4% | +17.6% | +62.3% |
| All | +100.7% | -44.1% | +144.8% | +74.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling