+290.4%
ZETA vs STZ
-47.2%
+337.6%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.7% | -3.4% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -1.9% | +4.6% | +3.0% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -1.9% | +17.7% | +16.1% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -6.2% | +41.7% | +36.6% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -14.0% | +81.1% | +70.8% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -5.1% | +59.2% | +50.0% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -9.6% | +77.4% | +65.9% |
| All | +290.4% | -47.2% | +337.6% | +316.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling