+290.4%
ZETA vs SNAP
-42.1%
+332.5%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SNAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -4.0% | 0.0% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +0.7% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +2.6% | +13.2% | +14.2% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -9.9% | +45.3% | +37.8% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +1.9% | +65.2% | +62.2% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -32.2% | +86.3% | +68.8% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -22.8% | +90.7% | +77.9% |
| All | +290.4% | -42.1% | +332.5% | +265.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SNAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SNAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SNAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SNAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling