+291.9%
ZETA vs PL
+454.1%
-162.3%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.3% | -2.8% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -9.3% | +12.0% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -18.9% | +34.7% | +19.5% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -58.4% | +93.8% | +54.0% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -30.3% | +97.4% | +69.4% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -8.1% | +62.2% | +47.1% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +180.5% | -112.7% | +24.8% |
| All | +291.9% | +454.1% | -162.3% | +98.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling