+281.7%
ZETA vs PENG
+184.4%
+97.3%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +12.4% | -7.1% | +2.7% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -19.4% | +19.0% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -8.0% | -42.4% | +34.4% | +1.7% |
| 3M | +21.4% | -25.6% | +47.0% | +25.8% |
| 6M | +80.1% | +7.3% | +72.8% | +56.9% |
| YTD | +52.5% | +113.9% | -61.4% | +3.8% |
| 1Y | +58.5% | +93.6% | -35.1% | +11.2% |
| 3Y | +281.7% | +170.2% | +111.5% | +90.9% |
| All | +281.7% | +184.4% | +97.3% | +90.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling