+62.0%
ZETA vs NTAP
+51.1%
+11.0%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.6% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -6.5% | -1.0% | -5.5% | -6.0% |
| 30D | +4.8% | -7.5% | +12.3% | +9.3% |
| 3M | +53.3% | +14.6% | +38.7% | +38.8% |
| 6M | +66.8% | +91.0% | -24.2% | +2.7% |
| YTD | +50.2% | +73.7% | -23.5% | +1.2% |
| 1Y | +62.0% | +51.2% | +10.8% | +27.4% |
| All | +62.0% | +51.1% | +11.0% | +27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling