+82.1%
ZETA vs NTAP
+70.2%
+11.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +1.6% | -2.9% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +26.5% | +9.9% | +16.6% | +20.8% |
| 30D | +10.3% | -22.1% | +32.4% | +23.9% |
| 3M | +30.5% | -7.7% | +38.2% | +34.2% |
| 6M | +129.4% | +60.9% | +68.4% | +69.0% |
| YTD | +83.1% | +76.4% | +6.7% | +28.0% |
| 1Y | +82.1% | +69.3% | +12.7% | +34.2% |
| All | +82.1% | +70.2% | +11.9% | +34.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling