+67.8%
ZETA vs NTAP
+61.4%
+6.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +0.1% | -4.2% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.8% | +3.4% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -0.5% | +16.4% | +15.4% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +4.1% | +31.3% | +30.4% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +88.0% | -20.8% | +5.3% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +75.6% | -21.5% | +3.6% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +58.9% | +8.9% | +27.9% |
| All | +67.8% | +61.4% | +6.4% | +27.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling