+273.7%
ZETA vs NOC
+28.0%
+245.7%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.6% | -0.6% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -1.6% | +1.5% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +10.5% | -10.4% | +20.8% | +12.2% |
| 3M | +44.3% | -5.6% | +49.9% | +45.3% |
| 6M | +59.4% | -30.4% | +89.8% | +67.8% |
| YTD | +49.5% | -8.5% | +58.0% | +49.4% |
| 1Y | +62.7% | -8.3% | +71.0% | +62.7% |
| All | +273.7% | +28.0% | +245.7% | +250.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling