+270.8%
ZETA vs NBIX
+43.8%
+226.9%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.2% | -1.0% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +0.4% | -4.1% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +5.7% | -0.2% | +5.9% | +5.7% |
| 3M | +50.4% | -4.0% | +54.4% | +51.2% |
| 6M | +65.5% | +20.6% | +44.9% | +52.0% |
| YTD | +48.3% | +10.1% | +38.2% | +40.6% |
| 1Y | +45.4% | +8.8% | +36.6% | +38.5% |
| 3Y | +270.8% | +42.5% | +228.3% | +203.6% |
| All | +270.8% | +43.8% | +226.9% | +203.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling