+275.4%
ZETA vs MTCH
-2.2%
+277.7%
-70.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTCH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +0.9% | -0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -6.5% | -1.4% | -5.0% | -5.7% |
| 30D | +4.8% | +13.6% | -8.8% | -2.5% |
| 3M | +53.3% | +22.4% | +30.9% | +35.5% |
| 6M | +66.8% | +37.2% | +29.6% | +39.0% |
| YTD | +50.2% | +31.8% | +18.4% | +28.1% |
| 1Y | +62.0% | +12.9% | +49.1% | +48.7% |
| All | +275.4% | -2.2% | +277.7% | +220.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTCH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTCH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTCH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTCH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling