+67.1%
ZETA vs LPLA
+17.6%
+49.5%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.3% | -3.8% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -3.1% | +5.7% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -0.1% | +15.9% | +15.7% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +23.2% | +12.2% | +25.9% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +15.5% | +51.6% | +57.8% |
| All | +67.1% | +17.6% | +49.5% | +57.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling