+67.8%
ZETA vs LPLA
+0.7%
+67.1%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.3% | -3.8% | -3.9% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -3.1% | +5.7% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -0.1% | +15.9% | +15.7% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +23.2% | +12.2% | +20.9% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +15.5% | +51.6% | +53.7% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +0.9% | +53.2% | +51.4% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +0.2% | +67.7% | +64.8% |
| All | +67.8% | +0.7% | +67.1% | +64.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling