+63.0%
ZETA vs LDOS
-30.4%
+93.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.5% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +6.2% | -5.8% | +12.1% | +9.0% |
| 30D | -2.0% | +11.6% | -13.6% | -8.1% |
| 3M | +21.7% | -1.0% | +22.7% | +22.2% |
| 6M | +89.1% | +5.1% | +84.1% | +82.9% |
| YTD | +59.3% | -24.0% | +83.4% | +92.6% |
| All | +63.0% | -30.4% | +93.4% | +108.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling