+82.1%
ZETA vs LDOS
-32.8%
+114.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -2.1% | +0.8% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +26.5% | -3.5% | +29.9% | +28.4% |
| 30D | +10.3% | +9.5% | +0.7% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +30.5% | -6.3% | +36.8% | +34.7% |
| 6M | +129.4% | +2.8% | +126.5% | +123.0% |
| YTD | +83.1% | -26.6% | +109.8% | +124.7% |
| 1Y | +82.1% | -31.3% | +113.4% | +138.7% |
| All | +82.1% | -32.8% | +114.9% | +138.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling