+90.3%
ZETA vs LDOS
-27.6%
+117.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +0.7% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -2.8% | -2.2% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +13.6% | -16.9% | -9.8% |
| 3M | +31.0% | +4.2% | +26.8% | +27.8% |
| 6M | +72.2% | -8.2% | +80.4% | +81.5% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -24.1% | +80.3% | +88.7% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | -31.2% | +121.5% | +124.4% |
| All | +90.3% | -27.6% | +117.9% | +124.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling