+30.1%
ZETA vs KRMN
+17.4%
+12.7%
-55.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -11.3% | +10.1% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -12.9% | +12.8% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +10.5% | -43.3% | +53.8% | +25.2% |
| 3M | +44.3% | -27.2% | +71.5% | +53.0% |
| 6M | +59.4% | -66.8% | +126.2% | +104.4% |
| YTD | +49.5% | -51.9% | +101.3% | +69.6% |
| 1Y | +62.7% | -43.7% | +106.3% | +71.8% |
| All | +30.1% | +17.4% | +12.7% | -2.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling