+67.8%
ZETA vs KRMN
-25.5%
+93.3%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.3% | -2.7% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -12.3% | +14.9% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -27.5% | +43.3% | +23.0% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -26.5% | +61.9% | +42.5% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -59.6% | +126.7% | +99.7% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -45.4% | +99.4% | +69.7% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -25.1% | +92.9% | +61.3% |
| All | +67.8% | -25.5% | +93.3% | +61.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling