+45.4%
ZETA vs GTLB
-4.2%
+49.6%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.7% | -0.6% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -5.7% | +2.0% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +5.7% | +15.1% | -9.4% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +50.4% | +65.5% | -15.0% | +13.1% |
| 6M | +65.5% | +102.9% | -37.4% | +12.0% |
| YTD | +48.3% | +25.2% | +23.1% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +45.4% | -5.5% | +50.9% | +27.7% |
| All | +45.4% | -4.2% | +49.6% | +27.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling