+98.0%
ZETA vs GTLB
+3.8%
+94.2%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +1.0% | -2.6% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +18.1% | -0.7% | +18.9% | +18.5% |
| 30D | +13.6% | -10.2% | +23.8% | +20.3% |
| 3M | +23.7% | +10.1% | +13.6% | +15.5% |
| 6M | +128.5% | +116.5% | +12.0% | +49.7% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +27.2% | +52.9% | +36.1% |
| 1Y | +98.0% | +8.6% | +89.4% | +48.5% |
| All | +98.0% | +3.8% | +94.2% | +48.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling